People v. Perez

2017 NY Slip Op 5861, 152 A.D.3d 805, 56 N.Y.S.3d 469
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 A.D.3d 1496
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 26, 2017·No. 2016-01925·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mangano, Jr., J.), dated February 10, 2016, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his application for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level designation. The mitigating factors identified by the defendant either were adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act Guidelines or did not warrant a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Kaff, 149 AD3d 783 [2017]; People v Rose, 146 AD3d 911, 912 [2017]; People v Ibarra, 137 AD3d 1097, *806 1098 [2016]).

Leventhal, J.P., Barros, Connolly and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 2017 NY Slip Op 5861, 152 A.D.3d 805, 56 N.Y.S.3d 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 5861 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ibarra
137 A.D.3d 1097 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Kaff
2017 NY Slip Op 2684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)