People v. Perez
120 A.D.3d 1158, 992 N.Y.S.2d 885
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 A.D.3d 1032 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2014·No. 13062 3346/99·Published
Opinion
Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), rendered on or about May 5, 2012, resentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 25 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the term of postrelease *1159 supervision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Perez, 120 A.D.3d 1158, 992 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
120 A.D.3d 1158 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)