People v. Perez
89 A.D.3d 597, 932 N.Y.2d 903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 67 A.D.3d 1324 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 22, 2011·Published
Opinion
The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of defendant’s application for resentencing in light of his extensive criminal record and his pattern of misconduct while incarcerated (see e.g. People v Marti, 81 AD3d 418 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 798 [2011]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Concur — Tom, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Perez, 89 A.D.3d 597, 932 N.Y.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 597 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Marti
81 A.D.3d 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)