People v. Perez

66 A.D.2d 489, 885 N.Y.S.2d 901
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 A.D.3d 1131

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (A. Kirke Bartley, J.), rendered November 20, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of three counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. A videotape showed defendant furtively reaching into the victim’s workspace and removing an object, and the remaining evidence warrants the conclusion that this object was the victim’s wallet, which [490]*490contained credit cards. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 66 A.D.2d 489, 885 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

66 A.D.2d 489 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)