People v. Perez

2016 NY Slip Op 7585, 144 A.D.3d 488, 40 N.Y.S.3d 758
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.3d 514
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 2016·No. 2184 7526/01·Published

Opinion

Judgment of resen- *489 tence, Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie G. Wittner, J.), rendered April 25, 2012, resentencing defendant to a term of five years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Defendant’s challenge to the voluntariness of the underlying plea is not properly before this Court on this appeal from the judgment of resentence (see People v Toney, 116 AD3d 607 [1st Dept 2014], Iv denied 23 NY3d 1043 [2014]; CPL 450.30 [3]).

Concur—Renwick, J.P., Moskowitz, Kapnick, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 2016 NY Slip Op 7585, 144 A.D.3d 488, 40 N.Y.S.3d 758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 7585 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Toney
116 A.D.3d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)