People v. Perez

269 A.D.2d 164, 701 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1047
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 A.D.2d 71

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered December 8, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. The evidence established that defendant was part of a drug-selling operation and thus constructively possessed the drugs found on the codefendant when both were arrested (see, People v Harrison, 238 AD2d 271, lv denied 90 NY2d 894).

The court properly admitted into evidence $210 found on defendant that was not prerecorded buy money. Such evidence was relevant to defendant’s intent to sell drugs and was not unduly prejudicial (see, People v Jones, 203 AD2d 183, lv denied 84 NY2d 827). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 269 A.D.2d 164, 701 N.Y.S.2d 905, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

269 A.D.2d 164 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jones
203 A.D.2d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Harrison
238 A.D.2d 271 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)