People v. Perez

222 A.D.2d 459, 635 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12525
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 194 A.D.2d 812

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered May 25, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to support his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under count four of the indictment (involving constructive possession of seven glassine envelopes of heroin) (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250), and we decline to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

Similarly, the defendant’s contention that he was denied his rights to confrontation and cross-examination is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 250, supra), and we also decline to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 222 A.D.2d 459, 635 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 459 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)