People v. Perez

208 A.D.2d 960, 618 N.Y.S.2d 579
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Orgera, J.), rendered January 12, 1993, convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under Indictment No. N11657/92, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered January 12, 1993 revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Buchter, J.), upon a finding that she violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. N11134/92.

Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

A review of the record indicates that the defendant entered her pleas knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17).

[961]*961Inasmuch as the defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are premised on facts dehors the record, they are beyond review on direct appeal (see, People v Dyson, 200 AD2d 756). Sullivan, J. P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 208 A.D.2d 960, 618 N.Y.S.2d 579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 960 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ortiz
216 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)