People v. Perez
179 A.D.2d 690
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 A.D.2d 344 →
Opinion
[691]*691The defendant’s application for a waiver of the mandatory surcharges imposed by the court is premature since he is presently incarcerated (see, CPL 420.35, 420.10 [5]; People v Angelista, 176 AD2d 238; People v Arfman, 167 AD2d 344; People v West, 124 Misc 2d 622).
We find that the sentences imposed by the court were not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Kunzeman, Lawrence, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Perez, 179 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).
179 A.D.2d 690 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Arfman
167 A.D.2d 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Angelista
176 A.D.2d 238 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. West
124 Misc. 2d 622 (New York County Courts, 1984)