People v. Perez

64 A.D.2d 956, 408 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12891
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perez. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 A.D.2d 656

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on September 9, 1976, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. We consider appellant’s pro se contention of excessiveness of sentence equally frivolous. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Fein, Lynch and Sandler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Perez, 64 A.D.2d 956, 408 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

64 A.D.2d 956 (People v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Saunders
52 A.D.2d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)