People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Perez

55 A.D.2d 938, 390 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10213

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 938 (People v. Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Perez, 55 A.D.2d 938, 390 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both rendered January 21, 1976, upon resentence, the first convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence (Indictment No. 243-75), and the second convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence (consolidated Indictment No. 376-75). Judgments affirmed. Subdivision 4 of section 160.15 of the Penal Law is constitutional (People v Felder, 39 AD2d 373, affd 32 NY2d 747, app dsmd sub nom. Felder v New York, 414 US 948). There was ample evidence for the jury to conclude that the defendant’s gun was operable. Furthermore, the court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sentence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both rendered January 21, 1976, upon resentence, the first convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree and robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence (Indictment No. 243-75), and the second convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence (consolidated Indictment No. 376-75). Judgments affirmed. Subdivision 4 of section 160.15 of the Penal Law is constitutional (People v Felder, 39 AD2d 373, affd 32 NY2d 747, app dsmd sub nom. Felder v New York, 414 US 948). There was ample evidence for the jury to conclude that the defendant’s gun was operable. Furthermore, the court did not abuse its discretion in imposing sentence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 938, 390 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perez-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack