People v. Pennestri

227 A.D. 726

This text of 227 A.D. 726 (People v. Pennestri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pennestri, 227 A.D. 726 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Motion to enlarge time denied. (See People v. Dryer, 227 App. Div. 629.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young and Seeger, JJ., [727]*727concur; Seudder, J., dissents and votes to grant the motion upon the ground that the failure to comply with the provisions of section 535 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was due to the fault of the court stenographer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dryer
227 A.D. 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D. 726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pennestri-nyappdiv-1929.