People v. Dryer

227 A.D. 629
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for enlargement of time denied. Motion to add appeal to the June calendar denied. In light of the fact that neither the case on appeal nor the briefs were filed within the ninety-day period, this court has no power, under section 535 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge defendant’s time to perfect the appeal. People v. Kautzmann (219 App. Div. 461) went no further than to hold that the time within which to argue could be extended provided the appeal had been perfected within the time required by section 535 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dryer, 227 A.D. 629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 629 (People v. Dryer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vignola
227 A.D. 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
People v. Pennestri
227 A.D. 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)