People v. Pender
175 A.D.2d 586, 573 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10094
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pender. Read the opinion of the Court — 144 A.D.2d 932 →
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to object, defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his argument that he had a right to be present at the in-chambers charge conference (see, People v Gallow, 171 AD2d 1061).
We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Pender, 175 A.D.2d 586, 573 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
175 A.D.2d 586 (People v. Pender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gallow
171 A.D.2d 1061 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)