People v. Pender

144 A.D.2d 932, 534 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14392
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1988·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: Defendant complained at his trial in 1982 that the prosecutor improperly struck the only two black persons on the panel from his jury. The prosecutor gave a conclusory explanation for his peremptory challenges. Voir dire was not recorded, more than six years have elapsed since the trial, the Trial Judge is no longer in County Court and defense counsel has died. These factors require a new trial (see, People v Scott, 70 NY2d 420). We find no merit to any other issue raised on appeal. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Bergin, J. — robbery, first degree; grand larceny, second degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pender, 144 A.D.2d 932, 534 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

144 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Pender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Merritt
148 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Lincoln
145 A.D.2d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)