People v. Pearson

137 A.D.2d 842, 525 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2004
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pearson. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 A.D.2d 737

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered May 9, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The People established a prima facie case against the defendant on the count of robbery in the second degree. Accordingly, the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a trial order of dismissal was proper (see, CPL 290.10 [1]; People v Levine, 106 AD2d 471). Moreover, it was not error for the trial court to exclude the self-serving hearsay testimony which defense counsel sought to elicit on cross-examination from the People’s witness (see, Richardson, Evidence §§ 220, 357, 519 [843]*843[Prince 10th ed]). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Lawrence and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pearson, 137 A.D.2d 842, 525 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2004 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

137 A.D.2d 842 (People v. Pearson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Levine
106 A.D.2d 471 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)