People v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Levine

106 A.D.2d 471, 482 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21502

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 106 A.D.2d 471 (People v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Levine, 106 A.D.2d 471, 482 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), rendered September 18, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The People clearly established a prima facie case against the defendant on each of the charged crimes. Thus, the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a trial order of dismissal was proper (CPL 290.10, subd 1). In addition, under the circumstances of this case and in view of the defendant’s second-felony-offender status, the sentence imposed of 6V2 to 13 years’ imprisonment on defendant’s conviction of robbery in the first degree was not improper or an abuse of discretion (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Murray, J.), rendered September 18, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The People clearly established a prima facie case against the defendant on each of the charged crimes. Thus, the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for a trial order of dismissal was proper (CPL 290.10, subd 1). In addition, under the circumstances of this case and in view of the defendant’s second-felony-offender status, the sentence imposed of 6V2 to 13 years’ imprisonment on defendant’s conviction of robbery in the first degree was not improper or an abuse of discretion (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., O’Connor, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.2d 471, 482 N.Y.S.2d 566, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-levine-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack