People v. Patterson
158 A.D.2d 557, 551 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1821
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The defendant’s general objection was not sufficient to pre[558]*558serve for appellate review the defendant’s present claim that the verdict sheet contained improper material (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1025; People v Oliver, 63 NY2d 973; People v Nimmons, 72 NY2d 830).
We find that the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein.
We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Patterson, 158 A.D.2d 557, 551 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
158 A.D.2d 557 (People v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Patterson
239 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Bunbury
218 A.D.2d 747 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)