People v. Patterson
140 A.D.2d 553, 528 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5453
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Patterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 A.D.2d 406 →
Opinion
We agree with Criminal Term that the prompt on-the-scene showup was not unduly suggestive or violative of due process (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Kunzemán, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Patterson, 140 A.D.2d 553, 528 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 553 (People v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Love
443 N.E.2d 948 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)