People v. Parodi

California Court of Appeal

People v. Parodi

85 P.2d 197, 29 Cal. App. 2d 625, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 393

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 12, 1938

DocketCrim. No. 2043

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 P.2d 197 (People v. Parodi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Parodi, 85 P.2d 197, 29 Cal. App. 2d 625, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 393 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court in the City and County of San Francisco of felonies, two charges of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code, and of a misdemeanor, violation of section 702 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Judgment was duly entered August 24, 1938, and defendant gave notice of appeal from the judgment. The transcript was filed in this court on October 3, 1938. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellant and the time granted for that purpose has long since expired. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on December 12, 1938. Counsel for appellant and for respondent both appeared at that time. Counsel for respondent moved that the judgment be affirmed and counsel for appellant consented thereto.

The motion is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court in the City and County of San Francisco of felonies, two charges of violation of section 288 of the Penal Code, and of a misdemeanor, violation of section 702 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. Judgment was duly entered August 24, 1938, and defendant gave notice of appeal from the judgment. The transcript was filed in this court on October 3, 1938. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellant and the time granted for that purpose has long since expired. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on December 12, 1938. Counsel for appellant and for respondent both appeared at that time. Counsel for respondent moved that the judgment be affirmed and counsel for appellant consented thereto.

The motion is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 P.2d 197, 29 Cal. App. 2d 625, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-parodi-calctapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack