People v. Paluso

81 P.2d 632, 27 Cal. App. 2d 769, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 746
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 21, 1938
DocketCrim. No. 3117
StatusPublished

This text of 81 P.2d 632 (People v. Paluso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Paluso, 81 P.2d 632, 27 Cal. App. 2d 769, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 746 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

WOOD, J.

In an information filed by the district attorney Emil Paluso, the defendant and appellant, was charged with violation of section 337a, subdivision 2, of the Penal Code in that on February 28, 1938, he unlawfully kept and occupied a room for the purpose of recording bets upon horse races. He was found guilty in a trial by the court and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment of conviction.

The evidence offered by the prosecution was similar to the evidence offered in.the case of People v. Paluso (People v. Allen), Crim. No. 3118 (ante, p. 642 [81 Pac. (2d) 630]), in which the opinion of the court is this day filed. The contentions of the appellant in this case are the same as the contentions made in the case to which reference has just been made.

For the reasons stated in People v. Paluso et al., supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Grail, P. J., and McComb, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 18, 1938.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Paluso
81 P.2d 630 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 P.2d 632, 27 Cal. App. 2d 769, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paluso-calctapp-1938.