People v. Paige

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Paige

945 N.E.2d 1028, 16 N.Y.3d 816

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 29, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 945 N.E.2d 1028 (People v. Paige) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Paige, 945 N.E.2d 1028, 16 N.Y.3d 816 (N.Y. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Whether an officer had a reasonable belief that the subject of the arrest warrant was in the home so as to demand entry into the residence is a mixed question of law and fact, which, if supported by record evidence, is beyond further review by this Court (see generally People v Francois, 14 NY3d 732 [2010]). We conclude that record evidence exists to support the determinations of the courts below.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI