People v. Paddyfote

107 A.D.3d 745, 966 N.Y.S.2d 673
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 5, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 107 A.D.3d 745 (People v. Paddyfote) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Paddyfote, 107 A.D.3d 745, 966 N.Y.S.2d 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed November 16, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground, inter alia, that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court made several inaccurate and inconsistent statements during the plea and sentencing proceedings, and that he is thus entitled to be resentenced. This contention is unpreserved for appellate review [746]*746(see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725 [1995]; People v Poznanski, 105 AD3d 775 [2013]; People v Williams, 70 AD3d 1059, 1060 [2010]; People v Williams, 156 AD2d 608 [1989]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Dillon, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Carmichael
2019 NY Slip Op 2892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Paddyfote
112 A.D.3d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 A.D.3d 745, 966 N.Y.S.2d 673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paddyfote-nyappdiv-2013.