People v. Overton

297 A.D.2d 565, 747 N.Y.2d 159, 747 N.Y.S.2d 159, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8743
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 24, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 565 (People v. Overton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Overton, 297 A.D.2d 565, 747 N.Y.2d 159, 747 N.Y.S.2d 159, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Defendant’s motions to withdraw his plea and for the appointment of new counsel were properly denied without a hearing since the court reviewed defendant’s written submissions and gave him a full opportunity to amplify his contentions in court (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536; People v Senghor, 248 AD2d 299, Iv denied 92 NY2d 905). The court properly relied upon its own recollections of the plea proceedings and rejected defendant’s unsupported claims of innocence, coercion and ineffective assistance (see People v Hines, 267 AD2d 17, Iv denied 94 NY2d 921). Concur — Williams, P.J., Tom, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. McKinnon
5 A.D.3d 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 565, 747 N.Y.2d 159, 747 N.Y.S.2d 159, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-overton-nyappdiv-2002.