People v. McKinnon
This text of 5 A.D.3d 1076 (People v. McKinnon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Cayuga County Court (Peter E. Corning, J.), rendered September 6, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying, without a hearing, the motion of defendant to withdraw his guilty plea (see People v Overton, 297 AD2d 565 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 562 [2002]). “The defendant’s conclusory and unsubstantiated assertion that his plea was coerced is refuted by his statements during the plea proceed[1077]*1077ings” (People v Quijada-Lopez, 256 AD2d 478, 478 [1998], lv denied 93 NY2d 928 [1999]). The additional contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel is not supported by the record (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pine, J.P., Wisner, Scudder, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.3d 1076, 773 N.Y.S.2d 659, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mckinnon-nyappdiv-2004.