People v. Ortiz

297 A.D.2d 758, 747 N.Y.2d 789, 747 N.Y.S.2d 789, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8639
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, a class A-I felony (see Penal Law § 110.05 [1]; § 220.43), with the understanding that he would receive a sentence of five years to life. However, a sentence of an indeterminate term of imprisonment of five years to life constitutes an illegally low sentence for a class A-I felony (see Penal Law § 70.00 [3] [a] [i]). Apparently, the parties and the court were under the mistaken impression that the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree was a class A-II felony, which would permit the imposition of the agreed-upon sentence (see Penal Law § 70.00 [3] [a] [ii]). Under these circumstances, with the consent of the People, the conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree should be reduced to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree to effectuate the clear purpose and intent of the plea agreement (see People v Carter, 196 AD2d 633, 634; People v Rozo, 196 AD2d 514, 515; People v Laino, 186 AD2d 226; see also People v Labode, 280 AD2d 400). Accordingly, the matter [759]*759is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for that purpose. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Goldstein, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortiz, 297 A.D.2d 758, 747 N.Y.2d 789, 747 N.Y.S.2d 789, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8639 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

297 A.D.2d 758 (People v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Flock
30 A.D.3d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)