People v. Ortiz

273 A.D.2d 257, 709 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6225
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ortiz. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D.2d 960

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), dated June 17, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to vacate his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]). The defendant’s contention that he was coerced into entering the plea is belied by the record of the plea proceeding (see, People v Charles, 256 AD2d 472).

There is no merit to the defendant’s additional contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Ford, 86. NY2d 397, 404). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortiz, 273 A.D.2d 257, 709 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6225 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

273 A.D.2d 257 (People v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Charles
256 A.D.2d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)