People v. Ortiz

289 A.D.2d 419, 734 N.Y.S.2d 897, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12227
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 17, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered June 9, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and menacing in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant entered into a plea agreement pursuant to which he knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his conviction and withdrew all motions. Accordingly, the plea agreement effectively foreclosed appellate review (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733; People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10; People v Celardo, 198 AD2d 428). Friedmann, J. P., Smith, Adams and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortiz, 289 A.D.2d 419, 734 N.Y.S.2d 897, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

289 A.D.2d 419 (People v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Egbert
290 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)