People v. Ortiz

261 A.D.2d 102, 690 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4638
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered April 12, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal [103]*103possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490), including the arresting officer’s testimony that he observed defendant engage in a narcotics transaction and that during a search following defendant’s arrest, he recovered 14 plastic bags containing cocaine from defendant. Although defendant was tried in absentia and there was no opportunity to conduct an in-court identification, defendant’s identity was established by the arresting officer, who testified that the person arrested was the perpetrator. We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Mazzarelli and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortiz, 261 A.D.2d 102, 690 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

261 A.D.2d 102 (People v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lewis
57 A.D.3d 1505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Amadeo
268 A.D.2d 672 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)