People v. Ortiz

234 A.D.2d 952, 652 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13688
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ortiz. Read the opinion of the Court — 207 A.D.2d 279

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Defendant’s remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and we decline to exercise [953]*953our power to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, McCarthy, J.—Endangering Welfare Child.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortiz, 234 A.D.2d 952, 652 N.Y.S.2d 576, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

234 A.D.2d 952 (People v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)