People v. Ortiz

105 A.D.2d 760, 481 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20880
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), all rendered September 8,1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

[761]*761Defendant failed to properly preserve the issue raised as to the sufficiency of his plea allocution (People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Pascale, 48 NY2d 997; People v Bell, 47 NY2d 839; People v Warren, 47 NY2d 740): Even if defendant had properly preserved this issue, the record indicates that the guilty pleas were entered.into voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently (People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9; People v Nixon, 21 NY2d 338, cert den sub nom. Robinson v New York, 393 US 1067). Nor is any basis advanced requiring a modification of the sentence (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ortiz, 105 A.D.2d 760, 481 N.Y.S.2d 187, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 760 (People v. Ortiz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Maddy
110 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)