People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ortiz

89 A.D.2d 591, 452 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17668

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.2d 591 (People v. Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Ortiz, 89 A.D.2d 591, 452 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), imposed April 7, 1981, upon his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate period of imprisonment with a minimum of two years and a maximum of six years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to probation for a period of five years. The case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, to fix the conditions of probation. Both the District Attorney and the Department of Probation recommended that the court impose a sentence of probation. In our view that was the appropriate sentence under the circumstances here present. Mollen, P. J., O’Connor, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), imposed April 7, 1981, upon his conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate period of imprisonment with a minimum of two years and a maximum of six years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to probation for a period of five years. The case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, to fix the conditions of probation. Both the District Attorney and the Department of Probation recommended that the court impose a sentence of probation. In our view that was the appropriate sentence under the circumstances here present. Mollen, P. J., O’Connor, Brown and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 591, 452 N.Y.S.2d 327, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ortiz-nyappdiv-1982.