People v. Orane
This text of 148 A.D.2d 949 (People v. Orane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant forfeited his claim that the court [950]*950abused its discretion in denying his motion to disqualify the District Attorney’s office when he entered a guilty plea to the indictment (People v Manzo, 99 AD2d 817; see, People v Taylor, 65 NY2d 1, 5-6; People v Stephens, 122 AD2d 606, 608, Iv denied 68 NY2d 817). Were we to address defendant’s claim, we would find it lacking in merit (see, Matter of Schumer v Holtzman, 60 NY2d 46; People v Shinkle, 51 NY2d 417; Matter of Relin v Celli, 134 AD2d 960). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Maloy, J. — robbery, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
148 A.D.2d 949, 540 N.Y.S.2d 215, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-orane-nyappdiv-1989.