People v. Oliver

137 A.D.3d 1236, 27 N.Y.S.3d 401
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 30, 2016·No. 2014-00563·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated December 20, 2013, which, *1237 after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was properly assessed points under risk factor 14 (release without supervision) (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 17 [2006]). The People demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant’s release from incarceration was without any parole or probation conditions (see People v Davis, 130 AD3d 598, 599 [2015]; People v Pinckney, 129 AD3d 1048, 1049 [2015]; People v Callendar, 127 AD3d 1153, 1153-1154 [2015]; People v McNeil, 116 AD3d 1018 [2014]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Oliver, 137 A.D.3d 1236, 27 N.Y.S.3d 401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

137 A.D.3d 1236 (People v. Oliver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bangura
2020 NY Slip Op 4193 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
People v. Torres-Ordonez
55 Misc. 3d 1045 (New York Supreme Court, 2016)