People v. Oglesby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Oglesby

196 A.D.2d 896, 603 N.Y.S.2d 763, 602 N.Y.S.2d 155

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 896 (People v. Oglesby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Oglesby, 196 A.D.2d 896, 603 N.Y.S.2d 763, 602 N.Y.S.2d 155 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered August 13, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence, in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered August 13, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence, in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Lawrence, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 A.D.2d 896, 603 N.Y.S.2d 763, 602 N.Y.S.2d 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oglesby-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack