People v. Ogbolu (Chinadu)

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 14, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 50959(U)
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Ogbolu (Chinadu) (People v. Ogbolu (Chinadu)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ogbolu (Chinadu), (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

against

Chinadu Ogbolu, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered March 16, 2018, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered March 16, 2018, affirmed.

Defendant argues that his guilty plea to the charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent. Significantly, however, the only relief defendant requests is dismissal of the accusatory instrument rather than a remand for further proceedings, and he expressly requests this Court to affirm his conviction if it does not grant a dismissal. Since we are not prepared to dismiss the accusatory instrument that initially contained a class B felony drug sale charge, which was dismissed as a result of the negotiated plea, we affirm on this basis (see People v. Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]; People v Teron, 139 AD3d 450 [2016]). In any event, our review of the record indicates that defendant's guilty plea was entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily with the aid of counsel, and after the court sufficiently advised defendant of the constitutional rights he would be giving up by pleading guilty (see People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375; People v Sougou, 26 NY3d 1052 [2015]). Defendant's present challenges to the plea are both unpreserved and without merit.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: June 14, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The People v. Mactar Sougou /The People v. Rita Thompson
44 N.E.3d 196 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Teron
139 A.D.3d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Ogbolu (Chinadu), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ogbolu-chinadu-nyappterm-2019.