People v. Teron
This text of 135 A.D.3d 586 (People v. Teron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George R. Villegas, J., at plea and original sentencing; John S. Moore, J., at *587 resentencing) rendered January 17, 2012, as amended April 12, 2012, convicting defendant of unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle, and sentencing him to time served, unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the plea vacated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.
Initially, we need not address the issue of whether defendant’s challenge to his plea has been preserved, as we consider this claim pursuant to our interest of justice jurisdiction (CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).
Defendant was not informed by the court of any of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238 [1969]). While “the failure to recite the Boykin rights does not automatically invalidate an otherwise voluntary and intelligent plea . . . the record as a whole [must] affirmatively show[ ] that the defendant intentionally relinquished those rights” in order for the plea to be validly entered (People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 2015 NY Slip Op 08615, *2 [2015]). In this case, since the record is devoid of any indicia that would meet this standard, the plea must be vacated and that matter remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Saxe, Richter and Gische, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.D.3d 586, 22 N.Y.S.3d 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-teron-nyappdiv-2016.