People v. Nunez

31 A.D.3d 669, 817 N.Y.S.2d 912
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nunez. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 A.D.3d 298

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered September 15, 2004, convicting him of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention raised in point two of his brief is without merit and his remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nunez, 31 A.D.3d 669, 817 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

31 A.D.3d 669 (People v. Nunez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)