People v. Nunez

21 A.D.3d 814, 800 N.Y.S.2d 841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Nunez. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 A.D.3d 298

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered February 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant exercised control of a car (see People v Roby, 39 NY2d 69 [1976]), and did so with knowledge that he lacked consent of the owner (see Matter of Raquel M., 99 NY2d 92 [2002]).

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress his statement to the arresting officers. Miranda warnings were not required since defendant was not subject to custodial interrogation (see People v Huffman, 41 NY2d 29, 33-34 [1976]). Concur— Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Nunez, 21 A.D.3d 814, 800 N.Y.S.2d 841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 814 (People v. Nunez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Raquel M.
782 N.E.2d 64 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Roby
346 N.E.2d 540 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)