People v. Newton

240 A.D.2d 225, 659 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6484
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Newton. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 167

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered February 6, 1995, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 10 years to life and 8 years to life, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

[226]*226The court’s Sandoval ruling was a proper exercise of discretion where the court balanced the probative value of defendant’s prior crimes against the potential prejudice to defendant (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371; People v Post, 235 AD2d 299).

The claimed errors with respect to the court’s supplemental charge are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review them, we would find that the court properly exercised its discretion and meaningfully responded to a juror’s inquiry during deliberations when it provided a second response appropriately clarifying its initial response. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Tom, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Newton, 240 A.D.2d 225, 659 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 225 (People v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Post
235 A.D.2d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)