People v. Newton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Newton

221 A.D.2d 167, 632 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 221 A.D.2d 167 (People v. Newton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Newton, 221 A.D.2d 167, 632 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.), rendered March 31, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied (People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445). "The record indicates that substantial parts of the [22-month] delay were justified, mostly due to defendant’s pretrial applications and motions” (People v Garcia, 208 AD2d 425, lv denied 84 NY2d 1031), and relatively little delay was attributable to the People.

We have considered defendant’s remaining argument and find it to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.), rendered March 31, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied (People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445). "The record indicates that substantial parts of the [22-month] delay were justified, mostly due to defendant’s pretrial applications and motions” (People v Garcia, 208 AD2d 425, lv denied 84 NY2d 1031), and relatively little delay was attributable to the People.

We have considered defendant’s remaining argument and find it to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 A.D.2d 167, 632 N.Y.S.2d 962, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-newton-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack