People v. Navarro

2025 NY Slip Op 06261
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 2025
DocketInd No. 3035/17; Appeal No. 5153; Case No. 2024-00468
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 06261 (People v. Navarro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Navarro, 2025 NY Slip Op 06261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Navarro (2025 NY Slip Op 06261)

People v Navarro
2025 NY Slip Op 06261
Decided on November 13, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: November 13, 2025
Before: Kern, J.P., Friedman, Kapnick, Shulman, Hagler, JJ.

Ind No. 3035/17|Appeal No. 5153|Case No. 2024-00468|

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Bulfrano Navarro, Defendant-Appellant.


Jenay Nurse Guilford, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Alec Miran of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Addison Eisley of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Abraham Clott, J.), entered on or about December 11, 2023, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C.), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in adjudicating defendant a level two sex offender and declining to grant a downward departure, and we perceive no basis for substituting our own discretion in this regard (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime, which consisted of raping a sleeping six-year-old boy (see People v Eaddy, 152 AD3d 427 [1st Dept 2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: November 13, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Navarro
2025 NY Slip Op 06261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 06261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-navarro-nyappdiv-2025.