People v. Murphy
Opinion
| People v Murphy |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 01044 |
| Decided on February 16, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on February 16, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.
2014-05296
(Ind. No. 8742/12)
v
Randolph Murphy, appellant.
Randolph Murphy, Napanoch, NY, appellant pro se.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Amy Appelbaum, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 14, 2017 (People v Murphy, 151 AD3d 888), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 1, 2014.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, ROMAN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Maria T. Fasulo
Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
159 N.Y.S.3d 736 (People v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.