People v. Murphy

2021 NY Slip Op 07309
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Murphy. Read the opinion of the Court — 194 N.Y.S.3d 248
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2021·No. Ind. No. 4336/18·Published

Opinion

People v Murphy (2021 NY Slip Op 07309)
People v Murphy
2021 NY Slip Op 07309
Decided on December 22, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 22, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
ROBERT J. MILLER
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

2019-13149
(Ind. No. 4336/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Byron Murphy, appellant.


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Keith Dolan of counsel; Jong Hwa Ryu on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin P. Murphy, J.), imposed October 29, 2019, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte , 90 AD2d 80).

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, CONNOLLY and DOWLING, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Murphy, 2021 NY Slip Op 07309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

2021 NY Slip Op 07309 (People v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)