People v. Murphy

2017 NY Slip Op 4468, 151 A.D.3d 754, 53 N.Y.S.3d 552
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Murphy. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 A.D.3d 690
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 2017·No. 2014-06516·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), imposed July 29, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Ellis, 146 AD3d 806 [2017]; People v Bruzzo, 136 AD3d 1050 [2016]; People v Quezada, 122 AD3d 948 [2014]; People v Angelis, 94 AD3d 902 [2012]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Sgroi, Maltese and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Murphy, 2017 NY Slip Op 4468, 151 A.D.3d 754, 53 N.Y.S.3d 552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 4468 (People v. Murphy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Quezada
122 A.D.3d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bruzzo
136 A.D.3d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Ellis
2017 NY Slip Op 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Angelis
94 A.D.3d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)