Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Murphy

People v. Murphy

113 A.D.3d 701, 978 N.Y.2d 686
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 113 A.D.3d 701 (People v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Murphy, 113 A.D.3d 701, 978 N.Y.2d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Skelos, Roman, Cohen, and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 A.D.3d 701, 978 N.Y.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-murphy-nyappdiv-2014.