People v. Morrison

18 A.D.3d 887, 795 N.Y.S.2d 468
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered October 11, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence of identification was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s identity beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Schmidt, J.P, Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Morrison, 18 A.D.3d 887, 795 N.Y.S.2d 468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

18 A.D.3d 887 (People v. Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cruz
117 A.D.3d 748 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Colon
42 A.D.3d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)