People v. Morris
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pesce, J.), rendered December 23, 1992, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his identity as the perpetrator beyond a reasonable doubt is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245; People v White, 192 AD2d 736). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
206 A.D.2d 491 (People v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.