People v. Morgan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Morgan

70 A.D.3d 1356, 893 N.Y.S.2d 786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 11, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 1356 (People v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Morgan, 70 A.D.3d 1356, 893 N.Y.S.2d 786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Allegany County Court (Thomas E Brown, J.), entered April 7, 2009. The order denied the renewed application of defendant to remove a condition of his sentence of probation.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

[1357]*1357Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his “renewed application” for permission to apply to the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles for reinstatement of his driving privileges. The restriction was imposed as a condition of his sentence of probation. Defendant may not take an appeal from the order either as of right (see CPL 450.10) or by permission (see CPL 450.15; see also Matter of Pirro v Angiolillo, 89 NY2d 351 [1996]; People v Cohen, 222 AD2d 447 [1995], lv denied 88 NY2d 934 [1996]). The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed (see e.g. People v Ouni, 67 AD3d 1029 [2009]; People v Santiago, 63 AD3d 1656 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from an order of the Allegany County Court (Thomas E Brown, J.), entered April 7, 2009. The order denied the renewed application of defendant to remove a condition of his sentence of probation.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

[1357]*1357Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his “renewed application” for permission to apply to the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles for reinstatement of his driving privileges. The restriction was imposed as a condition of his sentence of probation. Defendant may not take an appeal from the order either as of right (see CPL 450.10) or by permission (see CPL 450.15; see also Matter of Pirro v Angiolillo, 89 NY2d 351 [1996]; People v Cohen, 222 AD2d 447 [1995], lv denied 88 NY2d 934 [1996]). The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed (see e.g. People v Ouni, 67 AD3d 1029 [2009]; People v Santiago, 63 AD3d 1656 [2009]). Present—Centra, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.3d 1356, 893 N.Y.S.2d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-morgan-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack