People v. Morgan

209 A.D.2d 952, 619 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11952
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Morgan. Read the opinion of the Court — 177 A.D.2d 655

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction of conspiracy in the second degree (Penal Law § 105.15) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.21 [1]), and the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495).

We reject defendant’s contentions that the conspiracy count [953]*953of the indictment is jurisdictionally defective (Penal Law § 105.25 [1]; see, People v Peckens, 153 NY 576) and that defendant’s retrial is barred by the constitutional and statutory protections against double jeopardy (see, People v Perkins, 156 AD2d 595, lv denied 76 NY2d 740). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Morgan, 209 A.D.2d 952, 619 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 952 (People v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. . Peckens
47 N.E. 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Perkins
156 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)